Saturday 22 august 2009
6
22
/08
/Aug
/2009
13:03
So, um, yeah, this movie is amazing in every way possible. I can't really say anything about its description, if I
really did, there would be too many spoilers.
Surveillance is written and directed by Jennifer Lynch. You are thinking, "Lynch, hey that sounds familiar!" And you are ofcourse right. It is in fact David Lynch's daughter. Does the overall tone
of the movie ring true to her family legacy? Abso-fucking-lutely. I loved this almost as much if not more than any David Lynch movie, because it shocked me in several ways, which hasn't been done
in quite some time. Also, the movie is more coherent than I was expecting.
This movie is by no stretch of the imagination boring, but I will say it is a builder. You know, that isn't even a good word for it. Let's just say it is still really interesting and edge of your
seat throughout entire film, but some spots are pure tension. And when I say tension, I really mean tension. I was so jumpy through the entire thing, not because I was scared but because I could
hardy sit still with all of the awkward and intenseness and what not.
I have to mention Bill Pullman's performance. This movie is by far the performance of his life, subtle yet tricky. That is all I shall say, although believe me I have much more.
If you can only watch one indie film this year, for the love of god watch this. Pass if you have a weak stomach and heart though, this one is a dousy.
By nat
-
Posted in: movie reviews
0
Saturday 11 july 2009
6
11
/07
/Jul
/2009
11:32
So,
I started this film thinking," surely this will just be another crappy low budget horror movie that everyone says is amazing and has no value just like so many others." Boy oh boy was I wrong.
This movie more or less rocked my fucking world. I never thought that existential and horror could go so incredibly well together. And no, it is not pretentious either. First of all, this is a
French film so for you non readers out there, don't even bother watching if you can't stand subtitles. Although if you are reading this blog, I would seriously hope you could take the time and
effort to read some stinking subtitles. Anyways, this film is basically about these two women who seek revenge for the horrendous torture that one of them had to endure. Luckily she escapes, so she
makes it her lifelong pursuit to find these evil people and kill them. Of course, most of her motivation comes from this really creepy manifestation(I think?) of another torture victim that was not
so lucky and beats the escapee on a daily basis until the poor girl kills the family that did this sick thing to them. It really is hard to explain so bear with me.
It turns out that the torture and killing of many other young women besides protagonists serves a greater purpose(wtf!!) and the organization doing the horridly graphic and insane torture is simply
trying to create martyrs by making these women so desperate to die that they will see the afterllfe, therefore proving that there is said afterlife.
I know it is alot to swallow, and it seems deep and boring from my poor explanation, but honestly you have to see this film. It is everything great horror should be: gory as hell, thought
provoking, ghoslty scary, revenge slasher, avante garde, and best of all, a complete and total mind fuck. Please, please see this indie flick and tell me what you think. I am still trying to
figure out what the hell the ending means and I would appreciate some feedback.
By nat
-
Posted in: movie reviews
0
Tuesday 9 june 2009
2
09
/06
/Jun
/2009
09:35
I have one major
outrage about this film: Why in the hell wasn't it nominated for Best Picture? Seriously, Slumdog Millionare? That movie was definitely not better than this great monumental
film. Believe me, I was one of those people who thought the hype for Million Dollar Baby was ridiculous, but the unhype for Gran Turino is even more ridiculous.
I especially loved the way everything comes full circle, and not in a corny Crash sort of way, but in a very subtle and slightly heartbreaking sort of
way. Walt(Clint) is a senior who has just lost his doting wife. He is a classic old school breed(much like his treasured car) and he truly doesn't mind telling people what he feels or thinks
about them. This behavior, especially now that his sensoring wife is dead, leads him into quick trouble with his neighbors. He lives around a diverse neighborhood, but he would rather have it the
old 1950's segregated way, and he is quick to use every stereotype in the book.
This sounds like a full in your face don't be racist movie, but it really isn't. Walt eventually learns a strange kind of tolerance and appreciation by helping his neighbors grandson, Thao,
become a man so to speak. Walt learns that this Hmoung family is more appreciative of his racist yet helpful existence than his own children ever could dream of being.
I felt that Walt was sort of like a Zen student in need of some dire enlightenment. His honesty, although downright mean and cruel, is also somewhat refreshing because at least he is speaking
what he believes to be the truth and isn't trying to hide behind political corectness. Not that anyone should or could speak the way he does to people, but he does know who he is.
The ending is so powerfully subtle and ingenius. I felt I learned far more from this movie than I ever could have learned from Crash because it didn't preach and perpetrate coincidence the way
Crash did. I cannot say how much I recommend this movie enough, it is funny, enlightening, sad, humbling, and even a little beautiful at times.
By nat
-
Posted in: movie reviews
1
Tuesday 19 may 2009
2
19
/05
/May
/2009
11:55
link to see trailer
I knew going into this *sigh* remake of the classic slasher film of same name that I probably was not going to enjoy
myself that much. But, all of my friends said,"The movie isn't that great, but the 3d glasses made the whole experience something amazing!!" So I watched part of it in 3d, and I have to admit, it
was a 3d movie like I have never seen before. Basically everything in this movie is in three dimensions, even something as mundane as the credits seemed to roll at a brighter pace. Did that save
the actual movie itself? I don't think so.
I did a bad, bad thing. I watched the movie withouth the 3d turned on. Frankly, the glasses were uncomfortable and I was getting tired of my 19 month old son trying to steal them. Yes, I realize
this changed the whole experience, but a good 3d movie should also be a fair 2d movie as well. This is in no way the worst movie I have ever seen, but it just doesn't hold up as a slasher
movie.
Yes, there are titties. And blood. And gore of sorts, but even the gore was pretty lame without 3d glasses. To be fair, it isn't anyone in particular's fault that this remake was not at its best.
Frankly, the original is considered one of the more low rent slasher movies of the 80's.
The story follows a miner who apparently didn't "bleed the lines" and got a bunch of his coworkers seriously injured or dead. He goes to the mine to party one night(already, the plot is shabby) and
along comes a man in a miner's uniform to come and slash slash slash. The "idiot" lives through the murder attempt and the slasher is seemingly shot dead, but oh no, the murders done by maniacle
slasher still continue and he is killing people close to "idiot'.
A few of the effects were down right awesome, and for that I applaud this film. For the rest of the movie, it just doesn't pan out. I would say avoid this one, if you have to see anything rent the
original and you will see why a remake was not the best of ideas.
By nat
-
Posted in: movie reviews
0
Thursday 7 may 2009
4
07
/05
/May
/2009
09:04
Seeing the trailer for Blindness, one might automatically think this is some sort of weird sci-fi
extravaganza, complete with strange twist ending and lots of killing and misuderstanding. I was going into this film with same idea.
Happily, I was suprised by the truth of this film, the truth that it was indeed much different than any movie I had ever seen in any genre, let alone science fiction. Blindness is a
slow-crawling-but-big-payout-in-end kind of movie that leads off of the fact that we all take our eyesight for granted. It also tries to answer the question: If we were suddenly stricken with some
sort of virus that causes us to lose our eyesight, how would we react as humans? Would our violent human tendancies shine through? Would we become desperately paranoid and essentially ruin our
country, maybe even our world? These are the questions that are answered with honesty throughout the movie.
It was not a suprise to me that the same guy who directed Children of Men(Fernando Meirelles) was indeed the same person directing Blindness. The offbeat camera movements and almost 70's style
lighting and tone are just a couple of the signature moves made odvious in both films. He is also great at building suspense by using steady cam shots and seeminly neverending no cut shots.
I recommend this movie full force. It taught me a few lessons on humanity in a very unpretentious sort of way, and I think it will have the same effect on anyone else(as long as you are not bored
by the 70's movie pacing).
By nat
-
Posted in: movie reviews
0
Recent comments